Something started bothering me immediately after I heard about the McCain VP pick and it became clear that Sarah Palin was uniquely unqualified for the position.
I sensed sexism. There’s the obvious sexism — the assumption that just because Palin possesses a vagina, disaffected female Hillary supporters would vote for McCain. But that’s not what was bothering me. The GOP bets that Americans are stupid all the time.
There’s something sexist about picking a woman who can’t compete on a national stage, and then using her to “shake up” the race and bait the opposition. There’s something sexist about the idea that she’ll learn at the knee of “the master” of foreign policy. There’s something sexist about the way the McCain camp and surrogates have responded to charges that she’s not qualified. Is it just me, or is it truly offensive to suggest that the men and women who call Palin “unqualified” are simply being sexist?
(And what if Obama surrogates had suggested that people who called him “unqualified” were being racist?)
I find it truly fascinating that by picking a woman, McCain and Co. have suddenly become the arbiters of what is or isn’t sexist.
Late Afternoon Update: I was talking to G.D., and he pointed out that using Palin’s womanhood as a shield against attacks isn’t so much sexist as it is politically cynical. While I agree with that to some extent, I still can’t shake my initial qualms. Perhaps it’s because of my own presumption that the default position of the GOP is a sexist one (and that many of the women of the party buy into the misogyny and patriarchy).
I guess the thing that’s bugging me is this: there are highly qualified Republican women who were passed over in favor of an under-qualified unknown. Why? I can’t help but think it’s because a better-known, experienced woman might be more of challenge to wrangle.
Late Afternoon Update #2: Straight from TPM, this clip speaks to G.D.’s point. Just listen.
I think from this point forward everyone should always assume their mic is live.