The White Racist Meme.

(by Jeremy Levine, x-posted from Social Science Lite)

It would be an understatement to argue that the mass media has taken on racial analysis with unprecedented zeal since the election of Barack Obama. Unfortunately, in attempts to present fair and balanced news coverage, cable news programs have typically included panels with representatives from both sides of the Left-Right ideological spectrum.

The problem with this method, of course, is that subsequent analyses usually follow the same tired pattern: “That was racist!” vs. “That is ridiculous! Race was not a factor!” At best, this produces unproductive exchanges. At worst, it woefully simplifies complex social process and interactions, institutionalizing diametrically opposed ideological camps instead of offering nuanced analysis.

Luckily, the Washington Post has Eugene Robinson, who wrote an important op-ed last Friday:

“Of course it’s possible to reject Obama’s policies and philosophy without being racist. But there’s a particularly nasty edge to the most vitriolic attacks — a rejection not of Obama’s programs but of his legitimacy as president. This denial of legitimacy is more pernicious than the abuse heaped upon George W. Bush by his critics (including me), and I can’t find any explanation for it other than race.

I’m not talking about the majority of the citizens who went to town hall meetings to criticize Obama’s plans for health-care reform or the majority of the “tea bag” demonstrators who complain that Obama is ushering in an era of big government. Those are, of course, legitimate points of view. Protest is part of our system. It’s as American as apple pie.

I’m talking about the crazy “birthers.” I’m talking about the nitwits who arrive at protest rallies bearing racially offensive caricatures — Obama as a witch doctor, for example. I’m talking about the idiots who toss around words like “socialism” to make Obama seem alien and even dangerous — who deny the fact that he, too, is as American as apple pie.”

Not to be outdone, Frank Rich weighed in on Saturday:

But there is a national conversation we must have right now — the one about what, in addition to race, is driving this anger and what can be done about it. We are kidding ourselves if we think it’s only about bigotry, or health care, or even Obama. The growing minority that feels disenfranchised by Washington can’t be so easily ghettoized and dismissed.”

Robinson and Rich hit the nail on the head. To argue one way or another that current debates over healthcare or other social policies are solely “about race” is to miss the point entirely.

Race is omnipresent in this country. Racial distinctions inform policy debates, delineate opportunity, and structure social interactions. But that doesn’t mean that all white people, or all white protestors, are uniformly “racist.” Nor can the omnipresence of race sufficiently and adequately capture the nuance of white racial identity. For different people, different social processes precipitate racial prejudice. Some learn from their parents, while others learn from conflict in the workplace. Some develop prejudices from economic competition with minorities, while others experience blind ignorance as a result of extreme social isolation. Among the so-labeled “racists,” some hold disdain for “welfare queens,” while others fear random violence from young black men. Some are overwhelmingly concerned with illegal immigration and “protecting our borders,” while others can’t even stand the thought of sitting next to a minority. Some believe in the racial profiling of Middle Eastern folks at airports, while others blame blacks for their own disadvantage. Some engage in recreational racism, while others use disdain for social policies like affirmative action as proxies for bigotry. Some whites hold a combination of these prejudices, while others hold none. Sometimes these prejudices are grounded in real life experiences, but sometimes they aren’t. At the very least, white racial identity and prejudice is complicated and takes innumerable, varied forms.

To discuss and analyze race is not to revert to an either/or, racist/not racist false dichotomy. Race matters as an everyday reality of inequality, yes, but it’s not as simple as the White Racist Meme suggests. Race matters because it’s always mattered. But racism matters in increasingly complex ways.

The question is not if race matters. The question is how.

Guest Contributor

Follow PostBourgie on Twitter or subscribe to us on Facebook.

Latest posts by Guest Contributor (see all)

  • ladyfresh

    The question is not if race matters. The question is how.


  • Spot on!

    Add me to the long list of people who have pulled out our collective hair over the epic fail of cable news to cover this topic with any accuracy whatsoever, let alone substantive analysis. They spend half of their time trying to figure out if racism even exists, and the other half arguing whether or not it was present at a given rally or protest. I give up.

  • Pingback: The White Racist Meme. « PostBourgie « curlykidz()

  • Jeff

    Excellent close!

    Your entry was a breath of fresh air I can honestly say. I think your closing words are strong and well thought; this simple idea of thinking our arguments through is one that is so easily denoted in our current society. The beautiful gift of free speech, in my opinion, has been at times stolen by those who do not view it as a gift.
    It is important for us: people who believe in the value of individuals, as well as the support of our country, to take our stands. These stands must be in, as Frank Rich said, the form of a “national conversation” that focuses on the vision of forward motion. Granted none of us are at the President’s desk right now, but if we waist our time on worries of his legitimacy we will be enslaving ourselves. He has his views on the bill of health care, but over all I believe that in his heart is a love for his people, the American people.
    We are this nation, we make it up in our advancements as well as in our fearful recessions; overall, those of us who are blessed enough to be sitting behind a computer typing our views, better spend twice the amount of time living it out. We do have the ability to better lives, if even just one other than are own than so be it. As we all know, things wont change in our society until we start to make changes ourselves. Lets begin the “national conversation” on a positive scale!

  • I agree with you. I wish more mature and insightful conversations, like this, could be brought to mainstream about this but unfortunately, the “dumbing down” of society has taken precedence over intelligence in the media nowadays. Thanks for posting.