McCain's Next Attack?

If the all-knowing Jake Tapper is correct, McCain’s next attack will be on comments Obama made seven years ago during a radio appearance in a discussion about slavery and the Constitution.

Political Punch (long, I know):

In that show — WBEZ-FM’s “Odyssey” — Obama discussed the role of the courts in civil rights.

Today, aides say, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., will seize on some of those remarks, as hyped by Mr. Drudge.

Obama in that interview said, “If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement, and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples, so that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be okay.”

“But,” Obama said, “The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, as least as it’s been interpreted, and Warren Court interpreted in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t shifted.”

Obama said “one of the, I think, the tragedies of the civil rights movement, was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still stuffer from that.”

A caller, “Karen,” asked if it’s “too late for that kind of reparative work economically?” And she asked if that work should be done through the courts or through legislation.

“Maybe I’m showing my bias here as a legislator as well as a law professor,” Obama said. “I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. The institution just isn’t structured that way.”

Presumably McCain will go after Obama in ways some on the conservative bloggosphere are today, accusing Obama of calling it a “tragedy” for not venturing into “the issues of redistribution of wealth” — though Obama’s campaign says that’s a twisting of his words.

“In this interview back in 2001, Obama was talking about the civil rights movement – and the kind of work that has to be done on the ground to make sure that everyone can live out the promise of equality,” Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton says. “Make no mistake, this has nothing to do with Obama’s economic plan or his plan to give the middle class a tax cut. It’s just another distraction from an increasingly desperate McCain campaign.”

Burton continues: “In the interview, Obama went into extensive detail to explain why the courts should not get into that business of ‘redistributing’ wealth. Obama’s point – and what he called a tragedy – was that legal victories in the Civil Rights led too many people to rely on the courts to change society for the better. That view is shared by conservative judges and legal scholars across the country.”

I’m listening to the radio show now, and the discussion is really interesting. It has little to nothing to do with the economy. Also, his comments on the Warren court are pretty thoughtful (and smart). I’m pretty sure he’s dumbed himself down for the campaign. You can download the show here. It’s certainly worth a listen, even without the current context.

Update: WBEZ posts more of Obama’s appearances.

Latest posts by Shani (see all)

  • ladyfresshh


  • quadmoniker

    It’s hard to see anything here that could really stick. I mean, people aren’t buying the idea that Obama is a socialist, because it’s ridiculous. To try to get this to play into an idea that isn’t working isn’t going to work. Plus, they would have to do some pretty serious word-twisting to make it sound bad. He’s saying that the civil rights movement succeeded in some ways, and most reasonable people see that as a good thing. He said the courts were not the venue through which to seek economic redress because they’re not structured in a way to do that, which is what conservatives are always on about. If this is what they had waiting to pull out at the last minute, then I think they really are sunk. What’s amazing is how careful Obama was with his words even then.

  • I’m with quadmoniker; this stuff may have been salient in the summer, or even in September, but the economy is basically dominating this election, and McCain’s fate was sealed when he responded to the crisis with a gimmick.

  • QM/Jamelle: Well, yeah. I really only posted this because the show is a good listen.