Overstating the Case, Part 2?

[vodpod id=ExternalVideo.629893&w=425&h=350&fv=%26rel%3D0%26border%3D0%26]

As usual with the Boondocks, the lampooning is so scattershot that it’s hard to figure out what they’re skewering. Are they criticizing BET? Are they criticizing the often-exaggerated criticism of BET? Huey’s naiveté? All of that stuff?

(h/t DrZRM.)

2 comments to Overstating the Case, Part 2?