Irrefutable Black Truth #3: The Validity of the 'Talented Tenth.'

webdubois

W.E.B. DuBois

We’ve got news.

There is no Talented Tenth. Or at least, not in the way it is popularly imagined.

We know that this comes as a surprise to the many African Americans who believe that the primary purpose for becoming educated is to lord it over others under the guise of “giving back.” But contrary to popular Black belief, the idea that there’s a small percentage of Black folks who are Better Than Thou and whose responsibility it is to Uplift the Rest of You Niggas is a fallacious one.

It might behoove those of us who casually toss around this term in reference to our education, accomplishments and literal talents (i.e. “I’m graduating from Columbia next year; I’m in that Talented Tenth, son.” or “Our fraternity’s been giving back to the community for years. We’re Talented Tenthers.”) to take a second gander at its origin.

We dig W.E.B. DuBois as much as the next guy, but it’s pretty obvious he was coming out of a seriously elitist* bag when he dreamed up this, the first sentences of his 1903 treatise:

The Negro race, like all races, is going to be saved by its exceptional men. The problem of education, then, among Negroes must first of all deal with the Talented Tenth; it is the problem of developing the Best of this race that they may guide the Mass away from the contamination and death of the Worst, in their own and other races.

It appears that the Love Black People/Hate Niggas Movement dates back to the turn of the 20th century. It doesn’t just predate Chris Rock’s Bring the Pain by a few years. It predates penicillin. And if you think we’re being overly sensitive, check this out:

From the very first it has been the educated and intelligent of the Negro people that have led and elevated the mass, and the sole obstacles that nullified and retarded their efforts were slavery and race prejudice; for what is slavery but the legalized survival of the unfit and the nullification of the work of natural internal leadership? Negro leadership therefore sought from the first to rid the race of this awful incubus that it might make way for natural selection and the survival of the fittest.

That’s right, folks. W.E.B. DuBois believed that slavery disrupted the course of natural selection—and that by feeding and clothing his niggers, Massa was enabling the “awful incubus” also known as the “Worst of the Race,” to survive long after they should’ve been devoured by nature’s weeding out process for those unfit to go on living—you know, those people who have a hard time pulling themselves up by their own bootstraps, those folks sucking up all the natural resources (and salaries) that should be on hand for people who finish their college studies.

Not that DuBois felt that every Black person who skipped the college experience should be counted among the awful incubus:

All men cannot go to college but some men must; every isolated group or nation must have its yeast, must have for the talented few centers of training where men are not so mystified and befuddled by the hard and necessary toil of earning a living, as to have no aims higher than their bellies, and no God greater than Gold.

It’s just that, if you don’t go to college, you’re to be pitied, because obviously you’re too thick not to be “mystified by the hard and necessary toil” of holdin’ down a job! Oh, and you also have no ambition beyond eating.

You can read the text in its entirety via the embedded link above, and you’re sure to find valid sentiments couched beside a bunch of classist, self-disdaining hooey. Perhaps you’re one of those eat the meat and throw away the bones folks who have no problem skimming over the copious parts of DuBois’ essay that refer to Black people as a “race of ex-slaves,” who all invariably need their characters strengthened by “higher,” post-high school education. If so, that’s fine. To each his own. For those folks, the use of the term “talented tenth,” may roll guiltless off the tongue.

But for others, for whom the term has simply become an approximation of esteem-building within the Black community or for those who’ve heard it on the lips of their parents and grandparents, but never really gave much thought to its origin or realized how insulting it could potentially be to a wide swath of the African American community, maybe you’d like to reconsider just tossing it around all willy-nilly.

See, the fact is: there is no superior faction of the race whose life’s duty is to uplift the rest of us dim, ill-witted, non-college-educated, character-less, dark-skinned people.

That’s a myth. And it’s a myth that has its roots in an elitism that even Obama’s toughest critics would find dizzying.

slb

slb (aka Stacia L. Brown) is a writer, mother, and college instructor in Baltimore, MD. Check her out here: http://stacialbrown.com and here: http://beyondbabymamas.com.
  • Big Word

    IMO, Talented-Tenthers+ Five Percenters= all of em are full of hooey. I honestly didn’t know their were black folk who actually took that expression seriously. Then again I didn’t graduate from college so…..

  • slb

    Oh, people take it VERY seriously. In Googling the topic, I came across a ton of stuff, including a college extracurricular association, a matchmaking site, and a Tavis Smiley-led HBCU tour, just to name a few “serious” endeavors that’ve slapped the Talented Tenth sticker onto their causes.

  • It’s deep. DuBois was elitist. That was one of the beefs with BTW – BTW (also about education and helping people out) was a bit more practical (in my opinion). He focuses on Agriculture and Mechanics as the education pathway. His Institution attracted these hard working come from poor sharecropping families boys to become college educated men and take that knowledge home to improve their farm and lot in life.

    But to be fair – Elitism is a very human trait. Every culture, at every time has asked “what to do with those dern peons?” We need them to do the hard work and heavy lifting (and military defense – of course), but not so many that they outnumber us, get in the way and try to “come up to the east side” and push us out of the big house. Cause you know it’s always those poor, less educated ones that have all of the babies and cause all of those social ills..[sic].

    Hypocrisy = being elitism and promoting egalitarinism.

  • There was a Talented Tenth group at HU when I was in undergrad. I don’t know what, if anything, they actually did, but there were fliers all over the place promoting their organization.

    I trade in the currency of black elitism & talented tenthedness (HBCU-educated, active sorority member, melanin-challenged, lol), and while I think the term is pretty ridiculous, I also think it’s something of an oversimplification to say that those who use it are insulting the Incompetent Ninetieth (kidding).

    But seriously, I don’t think there are as many elitists as you seem to think there are. I went to what may arguably be the most bourgie black school in the country, and I don’t know anyone who truly believed that there is a group of black people who are just destined to be better than the rest (well, Howard grads think we’re better than everyone else, but that’s an alma mater thing).

    (By the way, I’m starting to think that the charges Obama’s ‘elitism’ are really just symptomatic of Uppity Negro Syndrome.)

  • slb

    Could you explain the nuances I seem to have glossed over? I’m not quite sure how it’s an oversimplification to assert that people who claim to be the Talented Tenth are insulting the people they believe they’re duty bound to “uplift.”

  • Sure.

    People who say “Talented Tenth” often also consider themselves to be “blessed” or “privileged.” You use the word “uplift” but I hear the term “give back” far more often.

    You aren’t recognizing that many of the people in this “Talented Tenth” group aren’t bourgie upper-middle-class blacks; lots of these HBCU grads and BGLO members come from under-privileged backgrounds. Sure, there are elitists in the group, but there are just as many, if not more, who don’t use “Talented Tenth” in the technical sense. That is, they believe anyone can be successful with exposure to success and a little motivation.

  • slb

    It seems that using it in any sense would be problematic, particularly since the word “tenth” is there. It implies a very small percentage of a much larger, presumably… “un-talented?” populace.

    I don’t know; in my experience, that term’s been more divisive than inspiring, and to my mind, it’d make more sense to retire it than to proliferate it. In fact, I’d almost argue that the term Talented Tenth has the potential to be as incendiary as the word nigger. It’s a phrase and a concept of our own invention (where nigger isn’t) that seems to, whether intentionally or not, seek to draw a line in the sand between those who should have license to use their higher education to presume a position of authority and guidance over people without a comparable level of formal education.

    I agree that not everyone who considers him/herself part of the Talented Tenth began moneyed, elitist, or privileged. But isn’t that the point of DuBois’s essay? That those capable of “bettering” themselves, transcending the mass of “ex-slaves” whose sense of character would be greatly improved by higher education, would emerge as a separate, superiorly educated and capable group whose duty it would then become to reach *down* and pull up the others?

    I guess one of my points with this piece is that, using the term without knowing/acknowledging (or caring?) that it emerged from a very elitist, Darwinian space can be inadventently (or overtly, depending on the user of the term) offensive to people who don’t believe that there *is* a Talented Tenth… or that there should be.

    Wouldn’t it be less loaded to simply say, “I’m volunteering?” Or “I’m giving back to the community?”

  • “You aren’t recognizing that many of the people in this “Talented Tenth” group aren’t bourgie upper-middle-class blacks; lots of these HBCU grads and BGLO members come from under-privileged backgrounds.”

    As if that backgrounds negates folks from elitism once they have carved out a little privilege.

  • slb: Thanks for the clarification. I understand better why you take issue with it… the etymology of the term is very problematic. But like I said, I don’t hear as many people claiming that they’re duty-bound to “uplift” as I hear people saying that they’re “serving the community” or “giving back.” However, we’re coming at it from two different angles, and I’m sure you hear things that don’t register with me, and vice-versa.

    Demby: I guess you would know.

  • GD makes a point. Despite my humble beginnings, I find myself (more and more) confronting and dealing with my class biases.

    I’m a walking contradiction at times…but aren’t we all?

  • This brings to mind a story I heard on NPR a few months back re: the class divisions within the black community. the talented 10th paradigm has possibly led to a sort of nouveau intra-racial segregation…you can read the post here.

  • To quote Dubois from Souls of Black Folk in 1903 is to freeze the man in time, in the youth of his intellectual life. He didn’t die until 1963 (in Africa, having given up his American citizenship and the dream of integration he was holding out for in 1903). What about his later work? The truth is Souls of Black Folk doesn’t even begin to scratch the surface of his prolific career and certainly is no real measure of his political thinking, unless placed in the context of his intellectual life over the next 60 years. Many of the things he seems to feel strongly in 1903 (tslented tenth) and in 1926 (all art is propoganda) are not necessarily what he believes 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 years later.

    Students always trot out charges of elitism whenever Dubois comes up in class and love nothing better than to counter with the philosophy of Washington. Did Dubois, black phd from Harvard, author of the first book in the Harvard Historical series, expert in a number of social science and humanties fields, perhaps of one of the smartest men of his generation, think he was bit better than other people? Probably. But he also dedicated his entire life to dismantling systemic American racism (not accomodating, in the manner of Washington, who, despite his clandestine funding of civil rights test cases, was all too happy to let black people toil away in subservient positions in society while his own children were educated and prepared to take their place in Dubois’s “talented tenth”). He could have accepted any number of cushy positions at HBCUs (including Washington’s Tuskegee), but instead chose to remain an intellectual and political gadfly because he believed he had a responsibility to do so.

    Also, keep in mind that for Dubois it’s only ever a tenth any people’s population who are in charge. For Dubois it was naive to believe that the masses of people, whoever those people were, actually ran anything. Only those people who with certain kinds of education from certain schools, who participated in the culture in specific ways, actually got to make decisions for the rest of us. Dubois meant for black people to be in on that decision-making. Is that cynical or realistic on his part? Maybe a bit of both. But Hilary Clinton’s current battle to follow up a Bush dynasty with a Clinton dynasty, Obama’s Harvad law education, and McCain’s naval admiral father and grandfather suggests to me that Dubois was right about the way power is wielded.

  • As a person that was raised in a working class family, I didn’t hear this term until I got into college. I can see both sides of this discussion. Regardless of economic or social standing, people need to be able to be able to take care of themselves in a basic sense, but they also need to know that having a savings account, and not spending money foolishly will greatly impact your chances of surviving in the long term.

  • i’m not sure how any of that relates to the discussion, but let’s start here:

    “Regardless of economic or social standing, people need to be able to be able to take care of themselves in a basic sense, but they also need to know that having a savings account, and not spending money foolishly will greatly impact your chances of surviving in the long term.”

    Right. Problem with that is, there aren’t banks in poorer neighborhoods — they got check cashing spots. And you need to make enough money to be able to save it in the first place.

  • @ G.D.: 100% true. There’s only one bank and my neighborhood and about 10-15 check cashing spots all within a 5 mile radius. I can see how my last comment could be misconstrued, so let me rephrase what I wrote. We all know people (regardless of race) that juice others and the government for survival. Under ideal circumstances, if there were less people depending on handouts, and more people worked towards going to college or just trying to educate and provide for themselves, you’d have a more informed and better educated public ready to make decisions for themselves vs. a “Talented Tenth” making decisions for everyone.

    Another thing I’ve noticed is that, back in the day, you were already considered to be an elitist if you attended college. That still does not take away from the fact that alot of what DuBois mentioned was elitist. But if you think about it, does it not hold some truth almost a century later? How likely is it, that TyQuan the Dope Boy or Jim Bob the Hick would make it into the White House? I know being a Dope Boy or a Hick is not indicative of one’s intelligence, but at the same time, people in those positions are far from being the next president simply because they have not been groomed for that type of position.

  • LH

    It’s convenient if not en vogue to deride DuBois and those who comprise the so-called Talented Tenth as elitist, but absent from this criticism is anything approaching an answer to the question of who will save those among us who are in dire straits.

    There aren’t banks in poor neighbourhoods. To be born poor and black is to be rung up on a call third strike before stepping in the batter’s box. People who grow up in open air drug markets are practically foreordained to sell or use drugs. Without opportunity, poor blacks can’t get an education and without an education, poor blacks have no opportunity. But it’s the so-called Talented Tenth who’s the problem? Well, of course it is.

    The Dispossessed Ninetieth are but beggars to their own demise and the Talenthed Tenth don’t really care about anyone who isn’t their Kind of People. They attend college, join their little fraternities and sororities, use summer as a verb and turn their noses up at the people they “give back” to.

    The phrase Talented Tenth is no more insulting than offering nothing more excuses to explain why away the na’er do wellness of people who don’t even want better for themselves.

    If saying so makes me elitist, I am guilty as charged.

  • Brran: “We all know people (regardless of race) that juice others and the government for survival. Under ideal circumstances, if there were less people depending on handouts, and more people worked towards going to college or just trying to educate and provide for themselves, you’d have a more informed and better educated public ready to make decisions for themselves vs. a ‘Talented Tenth’ making decisions for everyone.”

    That seems like a reframing of the ‘do a better job saving’ comment. ‘Get educated.’ Okay, fine. But where? In Philly, where I’m from, half of the kids in the public school system are in poverty. The schools are badly run and manned by overworked or underqualified teachers. An education isn’t impossible, but it would take more than just personal agency to get there. It would also take the kind of stability and schools the people who live just outside the city limits take as givens.

  • slb

    consuela: Thank you for the thoughtful and informative response. I do think it’s unfair to freeze DuBois in a moment in time and not to consider his life’s end when discussing his professional beginnings. But the fact remains that the Talented Tenth term/ideal has become one of his most pervasive among Black classists. That it’s trotted out blithely and treated as commendable is what we’re challenging in this article. Now, the fact that DuBois himself amended his views on the need of the Best of the Race to become even better so as to “rescue” the Worst of the Race is a great and admirable thing. But those who brag about being part of the Talented Tenth in this day and age are dredging up his formative ideas of class/education divides and proliferating them for new generations–and they’re not taking his end-of-life positions into account as they do it, either.

  • @ G.D.: I get where you’re coming from. And I know exactly what you’re talking about. I went to public schools where there weren’t enough books to go around, and the teachers were underqualified amongst other issues. But like I mentioned previously, that would all take place under ideal circumstances.

  • Shebafarrah

    Um… DuBois lived to be almost 100. He came with the Talent Tenth idea when he was around 40, but by the time he was in his 70s he no longer believed in that idea and instead focused on Pan Africanism.

  • RKS

    Dubois was right. And by decrying that concept you all are submitting to the assumption, widely held, even by black folks, that black folks are and inferior race. We should stop accepting and even celebrating mediocrity.

  • Linda White

    I was just looking up “who was not in the talented tenth?” and came across this. Very interesting. Dubois was elitist but I believe that there was a talented tenth. However, those who worked hard to advance the cause of black folks were/are not necessarily in that 10%. One didn’t have to be an academic to help the race. Most importantly though is who were the other 50% or so? I believe that the majority of black folks post 1865 were church-going, upwardly mobile folks who believed in education and working for community betterment. I describe some of those people, some are my own ancestors who, born before 1900, didn’t finish high school but who, in their own way–through industry and hard work moved themselves and their families through society. http://www.backtherethen.com