Malcolm D. Lee, Cinematic Chameleon.

When Malcolm D. Lee arrived on the cinematic scene with 1999’s The Best Man, audiences marked his arrival by awarding him 34,074,900 of their hard-earned movie-going dollars over the course of the film’s run. A respectable showing for any debut film, this gross afforded Lee a bit of clout coming out of the gate. Perhaps it was timing. The Best Man opened two years after Theodore Witcher‘s Love Jones (another film that featured artsy, middle-class black folks and Nia Long as the star-crossed object of some writer’s affection). Audiences had been primed for the emergence of yet another African American film subgenre (hot on the heels of the fizzling “gangsta/hood film” niche) and it seemed that bohemian-swanky Black films were the natural forerunner.

Or maybe Lee’s PR were responsible for The Best Man’s decent debut, with their dogged insistence on letting everyone know that—funny we should ask, but yes—Malcolm D. Lee is related to Spike Lee; they’re cousins! Interesting little tidbit, that. Spike had been a part of Black American filmgoers’ consciousness since 1986, when She’s Gotta Have It hit the screen. We knew him; he’d given us intense, complicated, poignant, and sometimes baffling cinema for thirteen years before his cousin cropped up. Linking Spike and Malcolm as relatives undoubtedly set up some firm, if unvoiced, expectations. And knowing that Spike’s 40 Acres and a Mule Filmworks helped bring The Best Man to fruition only solidified those ideas.

Whatever the cause of the film’s gross, after viewing it, we had to reassess whatever presumptions we’d formed regarding Malcolm’s similarity to Spike. Malcolm, it seemed, had a lighter touch. He wasn’t as heavy-handed or “Message!”-driven as his cousin. His treatment of women was just as confounding as his cousin’s, but he also seemed willing to give them a bit more to do onscreen. And his sense of humor was firmly in tact–the film’s jokes weren’t as smarmy or tongue-in-cheek as those of, say, Giant character’s in Mo’ Better Blues.

In short: Malcolm D. Lee was broader than Spike. He was more accessible. For anyone who was starting to find Spike’s work a little pretentious, here was a revised Lee model–now with 50% less Agenda!

Three years passed before Lee ventured a sophomore project. His offering: Undercover Brother, a Blaxploitation parody of sorts that saw Eddie Griffin as the titular secret agent, angling to keep The Man from achieving world domination. Perhaps you remember it?

It involved the notoriously awful Denise Richards as a rival agent, who puts the moves on the afroed, fist-raising militant and temporarily subdues him with her assimilating influence. It wasn’t awful. And it certainly was unlike anything we’d seen since I’m Gonna Get You Sucka (the Blaxploitation parody film to end them all, really). But it also threw us off our mark a bit.

Here we were, thinking Malcolm D. Lee would be bringing us a filmography full of straightforwardly upscale African American characters in various states of romantic and professional unrest. And then he follows himself up with a parody film. Hmm. Black parodies are rare and successful executions of black parodies are even rarer. We admired his pluck for attempting to tap into that market–and his business acumen; Undercover Brother grossed $38,230,435. But we still wondered where he was going.

In 2005, we’d find out, when Roll Bounce opened. A period dramedy about competitive preteen/teen roller-skating wars in the ’70s—with Shad “Bow Wow” Morris at the fore, Roll Bounce marked Lee’s first commercial disappointment. Its opening weekend gross was only $7,570,366. The film would go on to make $17,378,977, halfing the overall earnings of The Best Man. To add insult to injury, ATL would open a year later, tackling similar subject matter with older characters, better writing/acting, and superior box office results ($21,160,089). Even so, Roll Bounce was yet another intriguing turn for the Georgetown-educated Lee, whose work kept refusing to fit into any set Black film mold.

We didn’t know what would be next from him—whether it would be innocuously watchable like The Best Man, cornily eye-roll inducing (even as it elicited involuntary chuckles) like Undercover Brother or fraught with bad acting and a weak plot like Roll Bounce. But we knew that, at the very least, it’d be interesting and unexpected.

In keeping with his every-three-years trend, Malcolm D. Lee has unveils his latest project this weekend. We know what you’re thinking, “Wait. I haven’t heard anything about an interesting Black film opening today….” And you’re right. There isn’t an interesting Black film opening today. But you know what is hitting screens this weekend?

Welcome Home, Roscoe Jenkins.

Of all the places Malcolm D. Lee has taken us during his relatively short career, the terrain of the broad, slapstick Black comedy hasn’t been one of them. Until now. No matter where we imagined Lee would take us next, it’s likely we didn’t expect a “You done forgot where you caaame from!”/”Mah-muuuuh!” kind of flick with Mo’Nique prominently featured in the trailer. In fact, in a September 2005 interview with Blackfilm.com, Lee stated that films fusing drama and comedy for realism’s sake are “the types of films he likes to make.”

We’re not saying that a broad/slapstick comedy can’t have effectively poignant moments. We’re just saying that in perusing early reviews, Welcome Home, Roscoe Jenkins reeeeally doesn’t. It’s too bad, too, because this is a premise we would’ve expected Lee to do a bit more with. Hometown boy makes good, then grudgingly comes home and finds himself unexpectedly humbled and awed by his roots. It’s an age-old tale (and terribly cliche), but it could’ve been well-executed. Instead it went for skunk-spraying and baseballs to the head of the grey-haired matriarch and, well, Mo’Nique‘s typically unfunny punch lines.

So we have to wonder: is he just doing this to recoup some of his monetary losses (if any) from the Roll Bounce flop? Is this a quick way to gain a little revenue to pour into his next film, Soul Men? Soul Men sounds like a return to form (if any pattern can be found in Lee’s work thus far), as it will see Samuel L. Jackson and Bernie Mac play two estranged ’70s band members, grudgingly uniting at the Apollo for a tribute show for their deceased bandleader.

Here’s hoping this Roscoe Jenkins thing was just a glitch in Malcolm’s Matrix.

slb

slb (aka Stacia L. Brown) is a writer, mother, and college instructor in Baltimore, MD. Check her out here: http://stacialbrown.com and here: http://beyondbabymamas.com.
  • Yeah, anytime Mo’nique is in your movie, it’s not a good look. She seems cool in person but every role she’s playes, she’s been a walking stereotype

  • slb

    BC- As a fellow Baltimorean with Mo’Nique’s high school alma mater in common, I do have a little secret loyalty to her as a *personality* (not as a comedienne, b/c I rarely find her funny or an actress, because… well, let’s be real). I just dig her b/c she takes B-more with her as she rises. She has that Baltimore accent she refuses to let go of (complete with referring to vinegar as “vinna-cuh” and adding extra “-ew” sounds to words like do and too) and when she hosts things (Apollo, BET Awards), she’s super-liberal with compliments and encouraging statements.

    … But she was also in on that whole… VH1 “Charm School” thing… and The Parkers. And Soul Plane. And all kinds of other corny stuff, so…

    I don’t really admit often that I like her. lol

  • Aisha

    I’ll reserve judgment until I see the movie. I’m not sure if I agree with your assessment. I generally dislike slapstick comedy but why should Malcolm be excluded from tackling that genre. If anything it looks like he has a lot of stories to tell and is using different lenses to tell them. I admire taking risk and trying to avoid pigeon holed. But GD will tell you, I’m surely not an authority on movies, lol.

  • slb

    Yeah, that’s what I meant by the second to last paragraph. It’s not that he should be excluded from taking on the genre altogether; it’s just that his previous ventures have hinted at an ability to tackle said genre in a savvier way.

  • I’m intrigued. I dismissed ‘Leroy Jenkins’ about 1/2way through the trailer (which I believe I saw before ‘I Am Legend’ – incongruent, much?) simply because of Mo’Nique’s presence. Does anyone really find her funny, or are they just trained to laugh at the big black sassy woman?

    ANYWAY, I didn’t notice that Lee was doing this film, and it almost makes me want to see it, because I suspect he could actually inject some heart into it. For the record, I LOVED ‘Roll Bounce,’ which had it’s share of silly slapstick moments, as did ‘The Best Man,’ if you really think about it.

    Maybe ‘Leroy’ is getting advertised as a slapstick comedy when there’s really more to it than that?

  • slb

    Shani-

    Did you like “Roll Bounce” better than “ATL?” i didn’t, but i think it was more about the characters in ATL seeming older (even though they may not have been; those Roll Bounce kids were supposed to be in junior high, no?) and T.I. feeling more compelling than Bow Wow.

    On Lee and slapstick: it’s possible that Leroy Jenkins isn’t a straight slapstick thing. Lee *has* said he prefers to balance drama and comedy. But most of the press I’ve read on it thus far seems to corroborate that the trailer is representative of the overall tone.

    I’ll likely catch it on DVD to see if that’s true. If you do wind up seeing it at the theatre, write in!

  • L-Boogs

    I’m just wondering what this says about the Black viewing audience? Does M. Lee’s foray into the slapstick realm parallel a lack of well-educated/high-browed ticket buyers? I had a random reading-over-my-shoulder-subway-rider point to the “Welcome Home…” ad in MY paper and say, “That’s gonna be GOOD! ‘First Sunday’ was wack, but that’s gonna be funny!” Hmm. He was willing to pay to see this film; I wasn’t.

    Granted, I didn’t see “Love Jones” until years after its theater run. (After “Boyz ‘n da Hood” I remember reading “Waiting to Exhale” when I was 12, and only because the movie was coming out.) But I feel that I’ve grown in my tastes. On the other hand, I have friends who are obsessed with “Martin” box sets now. It just depends on your preference, I suppose. If the only people willing to spend their money on moive tickets are those who enjoy slapstick, then Hollywood will only cater to that segment of the population. It’s the clcihed “sick, twisted cycle.” Are today’s film execs digressing? Perhaps new media is permanently changing the way we consume our cinematic diets? Why go to the theater when you can Netflix or download at the click of a button? Does Roscoe have a Netflix account? Where’s the relevance? Just something to ponder…

    For the record, I tolerated “Roll Bounce,” yet loved “ATL.” Probably because, in another life, I’d love to have that short, skinny, ex-convict, rapper’s fifth illegitimate child.